Feb 23rd
Last experiment didn’t work very
well with the species we used and/or the annealing temperature so this time we
used three new species; ZAL 70, 71, 72. Mr. Adams and I reduced the water by a
factor of 1.7 so that the concentration of the reaction remains the same.
Instead of the regular 17.5 Microliters for a 25 Microliter reaction we made
14. 8. With this change we also increased the amount of MgCl2 from
1.5 to 2.5 Microliters. In addition we made another row of regular water
amounts so that we have a better idea of which conditions work best for the
species.
With practice, this time I put the
two PCR reactions in an hour instead of the regular two. I am much faster with
the lab equipment and putting together the experiment. I also know my way around
fixing small mistakes such as Pipette usage or controlling amounts of Primers,
Q-taq, dNTP’s, Buffer and water to get good results.
With the remainder of my time in
the lab I learned to Morphological way of identifying the species I work with
in their molecular level. Mr. Adams introduced me to the shapes of Moths under
the microscope and their morphology
as a whole. The best way to identify the Species and place them in the right taxa is in fact through their reproductive
system the shapes of the male genitalia helps place it in the right taxa; same
thing with females.
Another nice post. In this blog you present both sides of your research, molecular and holistic, painting a complete picture of your activities. Also, you incorporate real-world realities: mistakes are made! Do more of all of this in the future.
ReplyDeleteThank you, I will make sure to incorporate that in my future posts.
ReplyDelete